Wiki for Development

I'm always excited to start a new development effort. There's always so much to learn about your new users, their domain, and the problems they're experiencing. At this stage, ideas to help solve these user problems are plentiful and the possibilities seem endless. The hard part is, what to do with all the ideas you can't fit into your first release? Often these get left on a white board, buried in an email, or forgotten in a Word document.

My team had this exact problem a while back. We started using a wiki to track feature ideas. It was easy to update and enhance this list, eventually slotting these features into planned releases. The wiki became "The Place" to document design decisions, track progress, and even hold our user documentation (which we exported later and included with the release). It became a very valuable development resource.

A Wiki is a great tool for teams to keep all your ideas and development artifacts in a central, easily accessible location with low overhead. This technology was such a good fit for our organization, it's now used for all our development efforts.

Why wikis work for development

  1. They are quick. It is easy for users to update, search, and organize content. Because information can be added so quickly, it does not require a large time investment

  2. They are accessible. Anyone with a connection to your intranet can access or update the wiki. You can also create a public wiki for your product. This could provide a valuable resource for your users to post tips and provide their own "wish list" of features. Helping to create your own community, is a great way to foster brand loyalty (especially when they realize you are listening).

  3. They are cheap. Many implementations are available free of charge. We use MoinMoin which is also the wiki used by many Apache projects.

Did you know?

Wiki is the Hawaiian word for quick and is very appropriate for this technology.

Discussion

What has you wiki experience been like? Does your development team use a wiki or some alternative?

More Info

Wiki Definition (Wikipedia)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Believe...

A recent reorg at my company left me with a new manager - and a different approach to software development than my team had been previously following.  Our new approach is one that I don’t necessarily agree with, but it led me to think about - and reevaluate -  those tenets of software development that I think are important and that I believe lead to increased quality and productivity. This post will consist of fairly high level discussions about how to organize code, teams, and projects - but contain very little actual code. Many of these ideas will not be my own.  They are mostly ideas I’ve learned from others and their willingness to share their experiences with me.  They are, however, ideas that I’ve practiced and hardened as I’ve worked to build my own ideal environment for delivering value through software . Many of these ideas I now take for granted as commonplace (even though they aren’t).  I felt a need to document them anyway - so people can understand what to expect (a
Read more

FRail :include

I really like developing with Rails, but I've been frustrated the last few days by some things Rails should do quite easily, yet doesn't. I've already written here and here about some of my struggles with Rails :include clause. Here's one more... Let's say you have a has-and-belongs-to-many relationship. If you :include this relationship in a find query, Rails will automatically create the join clause including the lookup table! That's cool. Unfortunately, it looks as if only the :include clause provides this piece of functionality. Why isn't the same functionality provided via the :join clause or through a general purpose module? This doesn't make any sense to me! I'm working on a database application where I don't need to display a lot of data, but the data displayed is heavily filtered by it's connections to other information in the database. I need to join a lot of tables to perform the filtering operation and using :include
Read more

Performance Tuning JCAPS - Part 2

It's been close to 2 months since my first Performance Tuning JCAPS post. Since then, we've noticed our servers running out of TCP connections under heavy load. Researching this problem, we learned that the JCAPS' JMS server makes heavy use of TCP in implementing Request/Reply queues . We approached Sun for guidance and they assured us that they've had success implementing high throughput applications using the JMS request reply solution... but how? It appears a multi-step solution is needed. First, running out of TCP connections in a scenario like ours is a JCAPS bug addressed in an ESR (110348) and rolled into JCAPS 5.1.3 Update Release 3 . We installed this update and noticed a marked improvement. Running my simple 75 user simulated test, transactions took 2521 ms to round trip (compared to the previous time of 20128ms). While this is great improvement, an average of 2.5 seconds is still really slow for this simple transaction. We reported our findings to Su
Read more