Accidentally Agile

A few years ago, I was asked to help develop a product prototype. The company had developed some new technology and the goal of the prototype was to demonstrate how this technology could be leveraged in a commercial application.
The leaders had a vague vision of what it was they wanted, and we started there. After the initial prototype was complete we started to say, “Boy that’s really nice, but it would be great if it did this!” We began applying Agile principles without even realizing what we were doing. We started defining new features and scheduled short development cycles to implement these features – testing as we went (I should note that we had some JUnit tests, but hardly enough to qualify for what would pass as test driven development). We repeated these short feature based iterations until we had a fully functioning prototype. It was great, we got a lot accomplished and it was fun.

Lessons Learned (what I would have done differently)

  • Lately, some users have expressed difficulty in creating a compelling story to demo the prototype. Though extremely useful, some features we created do not demo well. I’m wondering how much more effective the prototype would be if we had started with the “compelling story” and went from there. Ideally, we would have already had some potential users we could tap to examine their problems and how to solve those.
  • I’ve already mentioned, the relative lack of automated unit testing. As the prototype became larger, the lack of these tests was a bigger issue.
  • We had a really small development team so we didn’t have daily stand up meetings. We thought we could accomplish the same things in our hallway conversations. I think this was a big mistake, as we sometimes would interpret feature requests differently and not realize it for a few days or almost a week. More direct communication can never hurt.

Discussion

Are you using Agile or Lean principles in your software development work? How did you get started?

More Info

Agile Journal
Wikipedia -Agile
Winkipedia - Lean

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Believe...

A recent reorg at my company left me with a new manager - and a different approach to software development than my team had been previously following.  Our new approach is one that I don’t necessarily agree with, but it led me to think about - and reevaluate -  those tenets of software development that I think are important and that I believe lead to increased quality and productivity. This post will consist of fairly high level discussions about how to organize code, teams, and projects - but contain very little actual code. Many of these ideas will not be my own.  They are mostly ideas I’ve learned from others and their willingness to share their experiences with me.  They are, however, ideas that I’ve practiced and hardened as I’ve worked to build my own ideal environment for delivering value through software . Many of these ideas I now take for granted as commonplace (even though they aren’t).  I felt a need to document them anyway - so people can understand what to expect (a
Read more

FRail :include

I really like developing with Rails, but I've been frustrated the last few days by some things Rails should do quite easily, yet doesn't. I've already written here and here about some of my struggles with Rails :include clause. Here's one more... Let's say you have a has-and-belongs-to-many relationship. If you :include this relationship in a find query, Rails will automatically create the join clause including the lookup table! That's cool. Unfortunately, it looks as if only the :include clause provides this piece of functionality. Why isn't the same functionality provided via the :join clause or through a general purpose module? This doesn't make any sense to me! I'm working on a database application where I don't need to display a lot of data, but the data displayed is heavily filtered by it's connections to other information in the database. I need to join a lot of tables to perform the filtering operation and using :include
Read more

Performance Tuning JCAPS - Part 2

It's been close to 2 months since my first Performance Tuning JCAPS post. Since then, we've noticed our servers running out of TCP connections under heavy load. Researching this problem, we learned that the JCAPS' JMS server makes heavy use of TCP in implementing Request/Reply queues . We approached Sun for guidance and they assured us that they've had success implementing high throughput applications using the JMS request reply solution... but how? It appears a multi-step solution is needed. First, running out of TCP connections in a scenario like ours is a JCAPS bug addressed in an ESR (110348) and rolled into JCAPS 5.1.3 Update Release 3 . We installed this update and noticed a marked improvement. Running my simple 75 user simulated test, transactions took 2521 ms to round trip (compared to the previous time of 20128ms). While this is great improvement, an average of 2.5 seconds is still really slow for this simple transaction. We reported our findings to Su
Read more